Crick and Churchill

Francis Crick (1916-2004) was a brilliant molecular biologist, biophysicist, and neuroscientist who was co-awarded a Nobel Prize in Medicine for discovering and describing the structure of the DNA molecule.

Crick

Crick

In 1955, senior British government ministers had proposed that a science and technology-based school be established within the University of Cambridge in England. This seat of learning, to be named in honor of Winston Churchill, was to admit students to pursue undergraduate and graduate degrees in all subjects except theology.

Churchill

Churchill

On this basis, in 1960, Crick accepted a fellowship at the newly founded (all-male) Churchill College. Before long, though, a sizeable donation was made to the College by Lord Beaumont of Whitley for the building of a non-denominational chapel on the grounds. A majority of the fellows voted in favor of it. Crick the lifelong atheist was incensed at what he saw as the intrusion of mythology into a facility dedicated wholly to rational scientific thought.

Winston Churchill, in an attempt to avoid a very public spat over this controversy, wrote a letter to Crick in which he said that many at the College would “appreciate” a place to worship nearby. The chapel was to be entirely funded through private monies, and would be located on the edge of campus, as opposed to its heart. The chapel further would be open to men of all faiths and backgrounds, and no one would be forced or expected to enter it against their will.

Crick replied to Churchill on 12 October 1961 with a counter-suggestion that many at the College would “appreciate” a brothel nearby. Said bawdy-house could also be funded entirely through private monies and located on the edge of campus. The brothel would be open to men of all backgrounds, and no one would be forced or expected to enter it against their will. His letter to the former Prime Minister included a personal cheque for £10 as the first contribution toward that end.

The chapel was constructed. Crick resigned from the College shortly thereafter in protest. It is said that the two men never spoke again.

[Have an idea for a post topic? Want to be considered for a guest-author slot? Or better, perhaps you’d like to become a day-sponsor of this blog, and reach thousands of subscribers and Facebook fans? If so, please contact the Alienist at vadocdoc@outlook.com]

[Copyright 2013 @ The Alienist’s Compendium]

Sigmund and Nose Candy

Above-average intelligence and the ability to ‘think outside the box’ may in some cases be facilitated by recreational drug use. Proponents of substance decriminalization have held this, and while it’s an interesting hypothesis, it is not one without tremendous controversy and public health ramifications. Nevertheless, history illustrates a number of drug users who over their lives forged new and creative paths, whether related to chemical use or not.

One drug dilettante was none other than Sigmund Freud, originator of the concept of the subconscious and, amongst other honorifics, the Father of Psychoanalysis.

Freud was a trailblazer of his day, whether or not you subscribe to his approach to the human psyche. And he was also a big fan of cocaine, and advocated its use for a wide variety of conditions.

coca

coca

In a letter written to his fiancée Martha in 1883, Freud opined, “if all goes well, I will write an essay [on cocaine] and I expect it will win its place in therapeutics by the side of morphine and superior to it…. I take very small doses of it regularly against depression and against indigestion and with the most brilliant of success.”

Freud did in fact publish just such a review:

“Über Coca,” Von Dr. Sigm. Freud, house officer of the General Hospital of Vienna. Centrallblatt für die ges. Therapie. 2, 289-314, July 1884.

He began his treatise with a description of the South American coca plant, erythroxylon coca, which is a bush that grows to a maximum of 6’ height and has ovoid shaped leaves. Though cocaine was chemically isolated by Gardeke only as late as 1855, Freud noted that Andean natives were known to have used coca leaves as early as 600 CE when “faced with a difficult journey, when [attempting to satisfy] a woman, or… whenever strength is more than usually taxed.”

Freud postulated cocaine’s benefits for a host of conditions, including asthma, migraine headaches, indigestion, pain, and as a stimulant in wasting diseases. However, like most physicians of his day, he held that cocaine’s greatest therapeutic effects would be seen in psychiatry, in no small part because of the drug’s ability to control melancholia and sexual dysfunction. Interestingly, Freud’s paper was also one of the first to propose substitution as a therapeutic treatment for addiction. While replacing morphine or alcohol with cocaine is something we now know to be counter-productive to recovery, the concept of substitution persists to this day (think Methadone clinics, and Xanax detox using Klonopin).

It is true, Freud conceded, that there can be ill effects from over-use. Commonly were seen dry mouth, dizziness, elevated pulse, and oddly, eructation. Anorexia was also noted, though Freud hastened to add that survivors of the siege of La Paz in 1781 were those who had taken cocaine in lieu of food when there was nothing to eat. He did describe in some individuals a “moral depravity” that arises when these immoderate users become “complete[ly] apath[etic] toward anything not concerned with coca.”

Freud took cocaine himself about a dozen times, employing 50 mg orally on each occasion. Afterward, he claimed, he had no craving for the substance. As far as psychic effects, he did report exhilaration which was the same as the “normal euphoria of a healthy person.” He felt “more vigorous and capable of work,” but he said the overall feeling was “simply normal” and he found it hard to believe that he was under the influence of a drug at all. He did observe a lack of desire for both food and sleep for several hours after ingesting cocaine. Following several trials, he hypothesized that the psychological benefits of cocaine were not due to stimulating effects, but rather “the disappearance of element in one’s general state… which cause depression.”

Freud did not recognize the addictive potential of cocaine, in large part because it was believed in the 19th century that only depressants – morphine, alcohol, laudanum – were habit-forming. Most clinicians felt that cocaine was then better classified with caffeine.

[Have an idea for a post topic? Want to be considered for a guest-author slot? Or better, perhaps you’d like to become a day-sponsor of this blog, and reach thousands of subscribers and Facebook fans? If so, please contact the Alienist at vadocdoc@outlook.com]

[Copyright 2013 @ The Alienist’s Compendium]

Beer Bottles

Shortly after the formation of his government, Prime Minister Winston Churchill delivered a speech to the House of Commons that would be committed to history with the title, ‘We Shall Fight Them on the Beaches.’ This oration, arguably Churchill’s finest and the one opined by journalist H.R. Knickerbocker as “deserv[ing] to be memorized by us all,” is that for which the great man remains best known and most often quoted to this day.

A less memorable part of the speech failed to make the newsreels and most history books. Thankfully.

The Prime Minister spoke on 4 June 1940. Holland and Belgium had capitulated weeks earlier. The French Republic was in its death throes, and the Battle of Britain was about to begin. The United States remained neutral, and the Soviets were not yet combatants. The situation was bleak, and Churchill had to deliver the news to Commons, and the public, that a great military disaster had befallen the Continent while not casting any doubt on the eventual outcome of the struggle.

Not easy to do.

The peroration – or dramatic summary – of his stirring rhetoric he gave thusly:

“We shall go on to the end.
We shall fight in France.
We shall fight on the seas and oceans.
We shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air.
We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be.
We shall fight on the beaches.
We shall fight on the landing grounds.
We shall fight in the fields and in the streets.
We shall fight in the hills.
We shall never surrender.”

Recordings of this moment reveal that Churchill then paused, both for apparent dramatic effect and because Commons thundered in applause and huzzahs. Due to the pandemonium that had erupted, though, no one was able to hear what Churchill said as he leaned down to an aide seated to his immediate right:

“And we’ll fight them with the butt ends of broken beer bottles because that’s bloody well all we’ve got left!”

Not nearly as stirring.

But as Paul Harvey used to say, now you know the rest of the story.

[Have an idea for a post topic? Want to be considered for a guest-author slot? Or better, perhaps you’d like to become a day-sponsor of this blog, and reach thousands of subscribers and Facebook fans? If so, please contact the Alienist at vadocdoc@outlook.com]

[Copyright 2013 @ The Alienist’s Compendium]